information aimed at reaching other Witnesses and at catching the
attention of headquarters officials. The latest piece to be published there is
a public statement by reform-minded members of the JW Hospital Liaison
Committees. Excerpts shed light on the reformers' thinking:
We are a group of brothers working at present for the
Hospital Liaison Committees in different places
and countries. . . .
Many positive things can be said regarding alternative
non-blood therapies, there is no denying that.
At the same time the facts are, that our
work would not be necessary if medical science
were to find a replacement for blood. However,
in August of 1997, blood is still a valuable product
for saving lives and sometimes we overlook the
benefit and the importance of using it. Even
among the HLC members who have many years of experience
in their assignment, you can find a complete
ignorance of why blood is used. These brothers
have been trained through Seminar's I and II, and the
only thing that many know about blood, is that
it is a dangerous medical treatment and should
be avoided. Not just because of Biblical reasons,
but because they believe that it is bad
medicine, and that there are good alternative
products available.
. . . What is blood? This may seem like
a simple question to answer, but it is not, for
there are a number of blood components that the
Society permits Witnesses to take. Are these
components not also blood, and how is it
decided which parts of the blood
are acceptable, and which are not? Since it is
acceptable to introduce these "allowed
components" into to our bodies, it is understandable that
Witnesses and medical personnel are confused by
our position? Although this question has been
in the minds of many brothers, no one dares to deal with
the question publicly. Why?
. . . During the surgery doctors use Blood Aspiration
with Automatic Anticoagulant Mixing, and the blood is
collected into a Blood Reservoir. It is then
drained by gravity into the Blood Bag, and
stored in a lowered position until it is filled. When the Blood Bag
is filled, it is raised to the top of the
assembly, and the blood is reinfused. Although
it is hard to see the blood as still being a part of
the circulatory system, the brothers accept the
procedure once they are told that the Society
has approved of its use, and that it does not violate
any scriptural principles.
Albumin: Albumin
is another problem. We accept albumin as a matter of
conscience, although the blood contains more
albumin than white blood cells, which we must
reject. Many doctors are also confused by this position, but
they usually are so respectful, and most of
them think that there are religious principles
involved although a clear contradiction exists. What
doctors donÌt know, and we are not
permitted to explain to them, is that
this position is clearly an organizational
ruling for the members, and lacks any logical
reason or scriptural support. . . .
. . . Some members of the HLC's feel
that the Society has overemphasized the benefit
of Erythropoietin. . . . many brothers
donÌt know that the real benefit of an EPO treatment comes
usually after 2-4 weeks. In about 3 days one
can find a small reticulocyte response, within
7 days for hematocrit response, and the final and necessary
benefit usually comes after 2-4 weeks. This is
important to understand, particularly in a case
of acute blood loss.
. . . Many cases have ended in tragedy, cases where
our brothers were attended by a cooperative
doctor, who was not qualified and lacked the
required experience to handle the case. Often times because
the doctor was not able to offer anything to
adequately replace blood therapy. The sad part
is that many HLC members do not realize that Witness
patients often die because of a lack of
commitment and the use of alternative treatment
in the hospitals. The only real cooperation is often to simply
let the patient die, and that is unacceptable.
. . .
Minor
Children: The most depressing feature of
being a member of a HLC is when our
children are involved. Why has the Society
completely failed to gain one legal case when
it comes to minor children? It is obvious, there is nothing
so effective as human blood to transport oxygen
and today there is nothing to replace its use
in the medical field. . . . As members of the HLC's we have
been eye witnesses of cases where cooperative
doctors have followed the parents wishes for
alternative non-blood therapy, and the results have
sometimes been tragic, with just one more
unnecessary death being the result.
A Question of
conscience? One of the arguments we use and
present to the doctors has to do with
the emotional damage done to a person
whoÌs conscience is violated by forcing
a medical treatment made of human blood. Every
reasonable person understands that it is
unacceptable to force a treatment that violates a
persons conscience. With most Witnesses,
however, their conscience does not really enter
the picture. They are simply responding to a situation based upon
how the Society has ruled on it. When we as as
JehovahÌs Witnesses look back
and remember the wounded and dead brothers who
did not accept vaccinations, blood serums,
organ transplants or hemophiliac treatments, we
must acknowledge that they took their stand
largely because of an organizational policy and
prohibition forced upon them. These positions have now
been abandoned by the leadership, and we rarely
if ever see brothers refusing vaccinations,
organ transplants, or any of the blood components on
the Society's approved list. This fact alone
should cause anyone involved in these
situations to pause and reflect seriously about the real
issues involved. Is the issue truly one of
conscience, and if so, whoose conscience?
In
Conclusion: We are a group of members of
the HLC's that have been carefully
considering these points, and we would like to
conclude this consideration with the following
thoughts. In particular, we direct our comments to the brothers
in Hospital Information Services for Jehovah's
Witnesses in Brooklyn.'
Quoting your own words during Seminars I and II, we
are supposed to be "trained
professionals" in our area of providing information
about alternative nonblood management and
cooperative doctors. That's fine, we have seen
many blessings and the very good results of that work. We
also hope that medical science can find
something to replace the present blood products
used in the medical field. What a blessing, not just for us
as Jehovah's Witnesses, but for all people of
the earth. Certainly all of the doctors are
going to rejoice when a replacement for blood becomes
available, and surely it will immediately be
applied in hospital protocols and procedures
for emergency care.
But, despite what is going to happen in the near
future, discovering new synthetic blood
products, new diseases and infections, or something
else, the real questions are still going to be
in our minds: Is the SocietyÌs blood
doctrine actually correct? Why do so many brothers enter into an
inner conflict about the issue when they
consider the biblical facts? Has the Society
really provided us with the truth, and all of the Biblical
facts regarding blood? Do they realize that in
accepting some minor blood components they have
created a tremendous contradiction in their firm
stand? Where are the serious and solid
arguments against stored autologous
blood transfusions? Do they appreciate that
their position kills many precious minor
children, unless the legal system steps in to provide protection
for their life and health? Should our main
concern as JehovahÌs Witnesses be
to look for medical alternatives, or to
confront ourselves with the biblical facts
about life and blood?
Your brothers, A group
of Members in Hospital Liaison Committee's
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
What follows is a letter we received from an H.L.C.
brother who has come face to face with the
problems, and has come forward to voice his concerns:
I am a regular reader of the different material and
information about blood at the Net. Also I have
the special privilege to be part of a HLC
(Hospital Liaison Committee). However, I
understand that we are working in a
very dangerous field because of so many
contradictions in our blood
doctrine. Personally I suffer and often work
with a deep feeling of guilt, particularly when
our brothers need to go through unnecessary pain
and death. I can personally testify to about 4
deaths of our brothers, where they could have
been saved. How? These brothers and sisters could have
been saved if available alternative treatment
approved by the Society had been used. But why
did they not use it? The doctors could not use the
treatments because the Witness patients
objected on the grounds that the
treatments contained fractions of human blood.
These patients were not able to explain why the
Society approves these treatments, but after the HLC explained
to the brothers, and the doctors, the Society's
position - they agreed. Sadly, in these 4 cases
I have been through, the patients died because
the necessary treatment was used too late.
I have shared the pain and loss with these brothers,
hugging them, talking with them, sitting
together with them in cold hospital corridors just
to share some fellowship, and human compassion.
These poor innocent brothers are victims and
they can't understand and explain their position except
for being faithful to organizational
directives. First they abstain completely from
all alternative blood products, but if the organization gives
their approval, then in a matter of seconds
they change their mind and heart. Let me be
very clear - I am ready to leave this assignment, I can't
continue to support this cruel doctrinal
enforcement. Precious children and
wonderful Jehovah's Witnesses are dying for
nothing. There is just one thing that keeps me
in this HLC. We are three brothers in different places that are
not supporting the Society's view. If someone
in Brooklyn reads this, then I want them to
know that we have been very successful in our work,
among doctors and brothers, as to distributing
information about our internal problems. We are
not pushing the matter, we respect the individuals
choice in this decision. But we also hope that
Society could take note of what is going on,
and in the name of the truth, love and justice, do what they
must do for our dear brothers.
I want to use this opportunity to thank the Liberal
Elder and some others out in the Net who
hopefully can be a valuable tool in saving lives
and changing erroneous
doctrines. Your
Brother, A Member of HLC
It is our hope, and our belief that many more sincere
brothers will come forward and join us as we
seek an end to the needless deaths and
suffering. We will act as an intermediary
between HLC brother's, or
organization officials who would like to
communicate with the HLC members who wrote
this treatise. You may email us at
jwreformers@nymserver.com
|